Submit.
The researcher completes a guided protocol application for the submission type, with validation as they type, document upload and a timestamped acknowledgement.
CLARALIX FOR RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES
Submission to decision, on one record.
The researcher submits, the secretariat screens and assigns, reviewers answer structured questions, the committee meets and records its decision, and amendments and continuing review follow on the same record.
THE ETHICS REVIEW CYCLE
Six steps,
one record.
Available today↗
Screen.
Administrative screening checks completeness against the committee’s requirements and records accept, refuse or a tracked request for clarification.
Assign.
The secretariat assigns one or more reviewers, with conflict of interest declaration and visibility of workload.
Review.
Reviewers work the committee’s question sets, section by section, with comments against the application.
Meet and decide.
The agenda is built from the applications on it. Members consent, declare conflicts and see the documents they are permitted to see. The outcome is recorded and minuted.
Continue.
Amendments, continuing review and safety reports are tracked against the original approval.
THREE PEOPLE, ONE RECORD
Researcher, secretariat, reviewer.
Ethics review is a configuration of the platform, not a separate product. Each section carries its availability label; a line is marked only where it differs.
01 / THE APPLICANT
Submit with confidence.
One application. Your details carried forward.
Available today
A guided, web-based application for each submission type, with validation as you type.
Your organisation registered once. Colleagues invited by your own administrator, with delegation by submission type and drafts saved and resumed.
Progress, queries and responses in one place: current stage, deadlines, history and formal two-way correspondence.
02 / THE ADMINISTRATOR
Manage with ease.
Screen, assign, meet and record, in one place.
Available today
Completeness and gap checks on every submission, with missing items identified and an outcome recorded.
Meeting agendas built from the applications in the system.
Assignment of each application to one or more reviewers, with responsibilities, deadlines and reassignment recorded.
The committee meeting run on the platform: invitations, member consent, conflict declarations, controlled access to documents, and the recorded collective outcome with minutes.
Dashboards for application status, reviewer progress and committee workload.
03 / THE REVIEWER
Review with clarity.
The application and your assessment, side by side.
Available today
Structured review: each section assessed against the committee’s defined questions, with a comment on each.
Other reviewers’ comments visible where the committee permits it.
Configured by your administratorsYour own worklist: assigned applications, due dates and status.
Recommendations and outcomes submitted on the platform, recorded with your name and role.
START WITH YOUR PROCEDURE
Bring your form and your meeting cycle.
In the demonstration we will show how the configuration works against your own forms, question sets and meeting cycle, and we will be explicit about anything that would require configuration effort, an integration, or development. You will leave knowing which is which.